There is no way in solidity to check if an address is a contract. One of the goals of Ethereum is for humans and smart contracts to both be treated equally.) _/ ^4 Y' H3 [1 x3 z$ `
https://stackoverflow.com/a/37670490/72189125 X3 ?, f+ |. h
* |2 A5 p/ D3 o
有时候确实有需要向智能合约转账:0 T& V: ^ p! z2 V
但是大多数 smart contract 的 token 是不能转出的,只要合约里没写转出的逻辑,就不能转出。以太坊将智能合约看做是独立的个体,没人知道它的私钥,给不支持转出的智能合约转 token 就等于销毁了。
当我们要转账时,会转到交易方的地址,不会闲着没事给智能合约转 token。但是这种事情仍然会发生,不断有人给 EOSTokenContract 转 EOS(见下图),EOSTokenContract 账户下现在有 154,834 EOS,价值 $1,176,738.4(价格 $7.6)。类似的,QtumTokenContract 账户下现在有 22,293 QTUM,价值 $158,280.3(价格 $7.1)。; a% u0 s# r) ~4 `
这些 token 都都都都销毁了 (⊙?⊙)" u: k4 f0 f/ N& }
* @2 a" m+ J* Z O6 i, x
Dexaran 认识到了这个问题,
Contracts that are not designed to work with tokens must reject incoming token transactions. Otherwise, each token becomes a potential token trap.
ERC20 token standard issues.(google docs) o* ?5 {5 U) K* x& M
% S$ ~2 Z. g9 ]+ \
并在 github 创建了一个 issue。* } \' W9 ?9 N# D
tokenFallback 函数,当转账到不能转出的智能合约地址时,将自动取消。
contract ERC223 {! N4 a/ O" l) T' l
function transfer(address to, uint value, bytes data) {
uint codeLength;
assembly {
codeLength := extcodesize(_to)
}- |8 O, b1 c: [2 A* X+ d5 m
balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(_value);/ h7 u0 v; z1 q9 p7 u
balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_value);
if(codeLength>0) {
// Require proper transaction handling.5 @% T/ X/ U4 h
ERC223Receiver receiver = ERC223Receiver(_to);8 E* A' Y( O! B7 i
receiver.tokenFallback(msg.sender, _value, _data);
}9 i: _9 E- q2 s. C: E
}
}
【todo】:代码解释
The biggest change is that ERC223 no longer allow token to be transferred to a contract that does not allow token to be withdrawn.7 M; _/ y! h4 ^; |
https://medium.com/cryptomover/what-are-erc20-and-erc223-tokens-307badcca5a